Abstract

The use of an enhanced version of the Beam-Truss Model proposed in a previous study to compute the nonlinear response of reinforced concrete coupled walls is discussed in this paper. The results of the cyclic tests of two seven-story one-quarter scale coupled walls tested in New Zealand are used for model validation. Except for the coupling beams, the specimens were identical. One of the specimens (Wall A) had a conventional arrangement of reinforcement in the coupling beams, whereas the other (Wall B) had beams with diagonal bars. Specimen Wall A showed lateral force–displacement response degradation after reaching a 1.6% roof drift ratio. The degradation in specimen Wall A was due to sliding shear of the beams. Specimen Wall B exhibited stable hysteretic response throughout the test.The authors use two kinds of Beam-Truss Models and compare computed and measured key responses in these tests. Computed responses, measured and not measured in the tests, are also compared with the results of Nonlinear Truss Models reported in the literature.This paper shows that the relatively simple and computational-efficient Beam-Truss Models predicted well important aspects of the response, such as the lateral force–displacement envelope, the sliding shear of the coupling beams in specimen Wall A and the ductile behavior of specimen Wall B.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.