Abstract

Abstract Application of non-Newtonian Power-law fluids (e.g. polymeric solutions) for production enhancement in petroleum reservoirs has increased over the last three decades. These fluids are often injected as viscous solutions to improve mobility ratio and enhance oil recovery during chemical flooding. As part of the flooding operation, surfactant (or micellar) solutions are first injected at the leading edge of the flood to reduce interfacial tension between water and oil. Subsequently, a slug of polymer solution is injected ahead of normal water to increase viscosity of the water, improve volumetric sweep efficiency and accelerate oil production. Analysis of pressure tests conducted pre and post injection, to evaluate mobility of these fluids, is more demanding than conventional techniques, which were developed strictly for Newtonian fluids. In naturally-fractured reservoirs, flow of non-Newtonian fluids is more complex due to fracture-matrix interaction which is usually resonated in the pressure footprints. Some models have been developed to aid interpretation of pressure tests, but boundary effects on down-hole measurements due to structural discontinuity and presence of an active aquifer, have not been thoroughly investigated. This article presents an analytic technique for interpreting pressure falloff tests of non-Newtonian Power-law fluids in wells that are located near boundaries in dual-porosity reservoirs. First, dimensionless pressure solutions are obtained and Stehfest inversion algorithm is used to develop new type curves. Subsequently, long-time analytic solutions are presented and interpretation procedure is proposed using direct synthesis. Two examples, including real field data from a heavy oil reservoir in Colombian eastern plains basin, are used to validate and demonstrate application of this technique. Results agree with conventional type-curve matching procedure. The approach proposed in this study avoids the use of type curves, which is prone to human errors. It provides a better alternative for direct estimation of formation and flow properties from falloff data.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call