Abstract
Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-MRI analysis pipelines differ across studies and sites, potentially confounding the clinical value and use of the derived biomarkers. To investigate how postprocessing steps for computation of cerebral blood volume (CBV) and residue function dependent parameters (cerebral blood flow [CBF], mean transit time [MTT], capillary transit heterogeneity [CTH]) impact glioma grading. Retrospective study from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). Forty-nine subjects with low- and high-grade gliomas. 1.5 and 3.0T clinical systems using a single-echo echo planar imaging (EPI) acquisition. Manual regions of interest (ROIs) were provided by TCIA and automatically segmented ROIs were generated by k-means clustering. CBV was calculated based on conventional equations. Residue function dependent biomarkers (CBF, MTT, CTH) were found by two deconvolution methods: circular discretization followed by a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)-adapted eigenvalue thresholding (Method 1) and Volterra discretization with L-curve-based Tikhonov regularization (Method 2). Analysis of variance, receiver operating characteristics (ROC), and logistic regression tests. MTT alone was unable to statistically differentiate glioma grade (P > 0.139). When normalized, tumor CBF, CTH, and CBV did not differ across field strengths (P > 0.141). Biomarkers normalized to automatically segmented regions performed equally (rCTH AUROC is 0.73 compared with 0.74) or better (rCBF AUROC increases from 0.74-0.84; rCBV AUROC increases 0.78-0.86) than manually drawn ROIs. By updating the current deconvolution steps (Method 2), rCTH can act as a classifier for glioma grade (P < 0.007), but not if processed by current conventional DSC methods (Method 1) (P > 0.577). Lastly, higher-order biomarkers (eg, rCBF and rCTH) along with rCBV increases AUROC to 0.92 for differentiating tumor grade as compared with 0.78 and 0.86 (manual and automatic reference regions, respectively) for rCBV alone. With optimized analysis pipelines, higher-order perfusion biomarkers (rCBF and rCTH) improve glioma grading as compared with CBV alone. Additionally, postprocessing steps impact thresholds needed for glioma grading. 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:547-553.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
