Abstract

To examine the prevalence and risk factors of intraocular pathologies after mature cataract surgery. The medical records of 115 patients (115 eyes) diagnosed with brunescent or white cataracts, who underwent surgery at a single primary center between January 2018 and August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Dense cataracts precluded preoperative fundus examination in all eyes; however, patients with fundus examination results within 3 months after cataract surgery were included. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with intraocular pathologies. Intraocular pathologies were observed in 37 eyes (32.2%) 11.8 ± 13.9 days postoperatively. The most common abnormalities were drusen (6.1%), myopic degeneration (5.2%) and diabetic retinopathy (4.3%). Intraocular pathology in the fellow eye was associated with posterior segment pathology in mature cataract eyes (odds ratio, 47.72; P < 0.001). The prevalence of each intraocular pathology found after mature cataract surgery was unremarkable. This study provides clinically useful evidence for clinicians to explain the risk of posterior segment pathology in patients with mature cataracts.

Highlights

  • A mature cataract, whether white or brunescent, is a totally opaque lens that causes severe visual loss

  • Intraocular pathologies were observed in 37 eyes (32.2%) 11.8 ± 13.9 days postoperatively

  • Intraocular pathology in the fellow eye was associated with posterior segment pathology in mature cataract eyes

Read more

Summary

Methods

The medical records of 115 patients (115 eyes) diagnosed with brunescent or white cataracts, who underwent surgery at a single primary center between January 2018 and August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Dense cataracts precluded preoperative fundus examination in all eyes; patients with fundus examination results within 3 months after cataract surgery were included. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with intraocular pathologies. Peer Review History: PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process; we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Results
Introduction
Materials and methods
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call