Abstract

From 1953 to 1985, a total of 1289 patients with primary carcinoma of the lung underwent surgical treatment. Of these 116 (8.9%) had small-sized (less than or equal to 2 cm in diameter) peripheral type lung cancer lesions. This study had three purposes: 1) to analyse how small-sized lung cancer lesions were detected; 2) to evaluate the reliability of diagnosis of small-sized cancer lesions; and 3) to evaluate pre- and post-prognostic factors of such patients compared with patients with peripheral type lung cancer lesions 2.1-3 cm in diameter. Of the 115 patients with small-sized lung cancer lesions were detected in the course of mass surveys. Cytopathological diagnosis in 75% of the patients resulted from transbronchial brushing cytology. The 5-year survival rate of patients who underwent resection of small-sized peripheral type lung cancer lesions was 70% (2.1-3 cm; 52%). Various factors such as histologic type, nodal involvement, pleural involvement, pathological stage, and success of the operation were shown to significantly affect survival. A comparison of two groups, i.e., those with lesions smaller than 2 cm in diameter and those with lesions 2.1-3 cm in diameter, showed the rate of lymph node metastasis to be significantly different. Of the patients with peripheral lung cancer lesions smaller than 2 cm who underwent surgery, 21% had peribronchial, hilar, or mediastinal lymph node metastasis. On the other hand, lymph node metastasis was seen in 43% of cases with peripheral lung cancer lesions 2.1-3 cm in diameter who underwent surgery.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call