Abstract

Within the field of soil mechanics a continuum assumption is generally adopted in order to avoid the complications of modelling micro-mechanical behaviour. However, certain constitutive behaviour can only be explained by investigating particle level interactions. Numerical investigations, such as those using the Discrete Element Method (DEM) to model soil particles as clusters of spheres, have delivered a greater understanding of the micro-mechanical behaviour. One of the limiting factors in current DEM approaches is modelling of the particle–particle or particle–surface contact behaviour. Hence, an experimental methodology has been developed and used to study particle–surface contact behaviour. The experimental methodology involves loading particles onto a piece of sapphire glass and observing the resulting contact area. In order to distinguish between the contacted area and the rest of the particle, the principle of frustrated total internal reflection and evanescent waves was used which results in only objects in very close proximity to the glass being illuminated and visible. This methodology hence allows the number of contacts and the area of those contacts to be tracked during loading and over time. This paper presents the validation of the experimental methodology by comparing the observed contact behaviour of plastic beads against Hertzian contact theory. In addition, the results from tests on sand samples are presented which show a density of 0.40 and 0.80 contacts per D_{50}^2 for coarse and fine grained sand respectively at an isotropic stress state which subsequently increases to 0.90 to 1.00 contacts per D_{50}^2 at peak deviatoric stress. It was also found that the fine sand particle contacts carried a maximum load of approximately 0.27 N per contact whereas the coarser sand was able to carry substantially higher loads.

Highlights

  • Geotechnical design has focused on capacity calculations with the application of large factors of safety and overly conservative designs

  • This paper presents the validation of the experimental methodology by comparing the observed contact behaviour of plastic beads against Hertzian contact theory

  • Particle scale investigations have mostly focused on the application of the Discrete Element Method (DEM), which typically uses spheres to develop a simulated model of a real soil matrix

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Geotechnical design has focused on capacity (failure) calculations with the application of large factors of safety and overly conservative designs. A common experimental approach to examine contact behaviour has been to make use of the principle of frustrated total internal reflection and evanescent waves [7,8,9]. This approach results in only the parts of an object in very close proximity to a contact plane to be illuminated by the light source. If an object is located near the interface or touching the interface, the evanescent waves will interact with the object and light intensity is transmitted This intensity can be either absorbed, reflected, refracted or diffused by the object depending on its own optical properties. With the size of the particles investigated in this study being significantly larger than the penetration depth magnitude, the part illuminated by the evanescent wave effects can be considered to represent the contact area

Experimental device and data processing
Validation with Hertzian model
Acrylic bead
Polypropylene bead
Sample with multiple contacts
Acrylic beads
Polypropylene beads
Single sand grains
Samples of sand
Conclusions
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call