Abstract
Recent investigations have found that the strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) meta-GGA exchange-correlation functional significantly over-magnetizes elemental Fe, Co, and Ni solids. For the paradigmatic case, bcc Fe, the error relative to experiment is $\gtrsim 20 \%$. Comparative analysis of magnetization results from SCAN and its \textit{deorbitalized} counterpart, SCAN-L, leads to identification of the source of the discrepancy. It is not from the difference between Kohn-Sham (SCAN-L) and generalized Kohn-Sham (SCAN) procedures. The key is the iso-orbital indicator $\alpha$ (the ratio of the local Pauli and Thomas-Fermi kinetic energy densities). Its \textit{deorbitalized} counterpart, $\alpha_L$, has more dispersion in both spin channels with respect to magnetization in an approximate region between 0.6 Bohr and 1.2 Bohr around an Fe nucleus. The overall effect is that the SCAN switching function evaluated with $\alpha_L$ reduces the energetic disadvantage of the down channel with respect to up compared to the original $\alpha$, which in turn reduces the magnetization. This identifies the cause of the SCAN magnetization error as insensitivity of the SCAN switching function to $\alpha$ values in the approximate range $0.5 \lesssim \alpha \lesssim 0.8$ and oversensitivity for $\alpha \gtrsim 0.8$.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.