Abstract

Abstract : U.S. military forces are directed to develop the capability and doctrine for Space control. To effectively employ forces in its achievement, the tasked operational commander will require an understanding of the operational factors space, time, and force. Analysis of these factors reveals the following: The unique character of Space alters the concept of position, and therefore positional defense, complicating the Space denial mission. The nature of time in Space warfare may obviate the use of anti-satellite weapons for Space defense and protection against deployed weapons systems, requiring other approaches to the problem. The nature of current forces is unsuitable for the day when enemy forces are capable of Space denial actions, requiring a change of philosophy in force architecture. For protection of our critical Space systems, territory and citizens, U.S. systems must defeat enemy threats before they reach orbit. The operational commander must consider attacking control facilities, Space system production facilities, and launch facilities along with orbiting Space forces. Since satellite defense will be extremely difficult, no single Space system should be so critical as that its loss or denial would significantly degrade conduct of its mission area. Systems designers should continue to pursue current initiatives in low observables, and satellite constellations. Contemporary Space systems do not comply with this design philosophy, therefore the architecture must change to reflect the demands imposed by Space warfare. Access to orbit must be improved with spacelift systems capable of generating sortie rates comparable to today's tactical aircraft, rather than today's reusable launch vehicles. Additionally, improvement in the ability to maneuver satellites is required.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call