Abstract
This paper compares the performance of three analytical methods for the determination of pesticides in natural waters. As many pesticides are non-fluorescent, they are transformed into highly fluorescent by-products in two ways: elevated temperature in an alkaline medium (thermo-induced fluorescence - TIF); or UV irradiation in water (photo-induced fluorescence - PIF). The first method studied uses TIF, the second one uses PIF and the third one uses an automatic sampling and analysing PIF system. Analytical applications were carried out using the three methods for the determination of deltamethrin and cyhalothrin, pesticides widely used in Senegal. In both cases, the calibration curves obtained are linear without matrix effects, and the detection limits are good in the ng mL−1 range. It appears that the analytical performances of the automatic PIF method are better than the two others. The advantages and disadvantages of the three methods are then compared and discussed in term of analytical performance and usability.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
