Abstract

Throughout the past public health early warning work, there is still a lack of early warning. Therefore, starting from the reform of the public health early warning mechanism, this paper sorts out the design and development of our country's public health early warning mechanism and its legal framework and further analyzes the unresolved problems that exist in early warning work. At this stage, our country's public health departments have put forward targeted suggestions for improving the early warning mechanism for emergencies and stabilizing public order. In this context, the following data are obtained: (1) The timeliness under the big data model is 73.81%, the prudence is 84.25%, the sustainability is 96.28%; the timeliness under the data mining model is 61.98%, prudence is 77.58%, sustainability is 83.24%; and the timeliness of the intelligent computing model is 53.44%, prudence is 65.58%, and sustainability is 96.28%. (2) During public health emergencies, the path of news dissemination includes 54 people for radio and television communication, accounting for 13%; 98 people for digital communication, accounting for 24%; 73 people for digital TV communication, accounting for 19%; the number of public relations companies was 63 people, accounting for 16%; the number of people who reprinted and spread was 52 people, accounting for 12%; the number of people who searched and spread was 73 people, accounting for 19%; the number of people who spread mobile phone messages was 32 people, accounting for 9%. At this stage, according to the characteristics of public health emergencies, the problems existing in the early warning work are analyzed, and specific suggestions for improving the early warning mechanism of public health emergencies in our country are put forward to stabilize the “public order.” Research in this area is ongoing.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call