Abstract

The aim of the present study was to access any changes in the muscle hardness of the masseter muscle between normal subjects and patients with myofascial pain during brief sustained isometric contractions at various bite force levels, and to compare muscle hardness, especially in terms of the recovery phase, after a clenching task. Ten patients with masticatory myofascial pain and 10 age- and weight-matched normal healthy controls participated in this study. First, the hardness of the right masseter muscle was measured at the bite force of 0, 3, 6, and 9 kgf with a hand-held hardness meter. Then, the subjects were requested to exert a 9 kgf-clenching task for 30 seconds. The muscle hardness was again measured at 5, 30, and 120 seconds after the task, and the data obtained were compared with the muscle hardness before the clenching task. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the patients and the normal controls, while the muscle hardness increased with contraction in all subjects. The present findings also showed that the patients had a delayed return to baseline after the clenching task compared with the normal subjects, although an immediate increase after the clenching task was seen in all subjects. The results indicated that patients with masticatory myofascial pain have different muscle properties in the recovery phase after contraction, probably because of a slower intramuscular reperfusion.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.