Abstract

A practical model for characterizing comparator metastability errors in SAR ADCs is presented, and is used to analyze not only the conventional SAR but also LSB-first and asynchronous versions. This work makes three main contributions: first, it is shown that for characterizing metastability it is more reasonable to use input signals with normal or Laplace distributions. Previous work used uniformly-distributed signals in the interest of making derivations easier, but this simplifying assumption overestimated SMR by as much as 18 dB compared to the more reasonable analysis presented here. Second, this work shows that LSB-first SAR ADCs achieve SMR performance equal to or better than conventional SARs with the same metastability window, depending on bandwidth. Finally, the analysis is used to develop a framework for calculating the maximum effective sample rate for asynchronous SAR ADCs, and in doing so demonstrates that proximity detectors are not effective solutions to improving metastability performance.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call