Abstract

Increasing fire size and severity over the last few decades requires new techniques to accurately assess canopy fuel conditions and change over larger areas. This article presents an analysis on vegetation changes by mapping fuel types (FT) based on conditional rules according to the Prometheus classification system, which typifies the vertical profile of vegetation cover for fuel management and ecological purposes. Using multi-temporal LiDAR from the open-access Spanish national surveying program, we selected a 400 ha area of interest, which was surveyed in 2010 and 2016 with scan densities of 0.5 and 2 pulses·m−2, respectively. FTs were determined from the distribution of LiDAR heights over an area, using grids with a cell size of 20 × 20 m. To validate the classification method, we used a stratified random sampling without replacement of 15 cells per FT and made an independent visual assessment of FT. The overall accuracy obtained was 81.26% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.73. In addition, the relationships among different stand structures and ecological factors such as topographic aspect and forest vegetation cover types were analyzed. Our classification algorithm revealed that stands lacking understory vegetation usually appeared in shady slopes, which were mainly covered by beech stands, whereas sunny areas were preferentially covered by oak stands, where the understory reached greater height thanks to more light availability. Our analysis on FT changes during that 6 year time span revealed potentially hazardous transitions from cleared forests towards a vertical continuum of canopy fuels, where wildfire events would potentially reach tree crowns, especially in oak forests and southern slopes with higher sun exposure for lower fuel moistures and increased flammability. Accurate methods to characterize forest canopy fuels and change over time can help direct forest management activities to priority areas with greater fire hazard. Multi-date canopy fuel information indicated that while some forest types experienced a growth of the shrub layer, others presented an understory decrease. On the other hand, loss of understory was more frequently detected in beech stands; thus, those forests place lower risk of wildfire spread. Our approach was developed using low-density and publicly available datasets and was based on direct canopy fuel measurements from multi-return LiDAR data that can be accurately translated and mapped according to standard fuel type categories that are familiar to land managers.

Highlights

  • Longitudinal studies using multitemporal remote sensing series can be very helpful for the purpose of monitoring and analyzing the dynamics of ecosystem structural features [1]

  • The same procedure was repeated for both the LiDAR files from 2010 and 2016, and we studied the changes of fuel types (FT) by comparing them

  • We developed a methodology to map FTs according to the Prometheus classification system using publicly available LiDAR data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Longitudinal studies using multitemporal remote sensing series can be very helpful for the purpose of monitoring and analyzing the dynamics of ecosystem structural features [1]. Resolution Radiometer (NOAA-AVHRR) [4,5], or urban forest carbon storage using Landsat 7 imagery [6] These approaches benefit from data archives spanning decades [7,8]. Despite being useful tools, satellite and aerial imagery based on passive optical sensors have limitations for vegetation structure characterization, such as the inability to penetrate forest canopies [9]. This may lead to a lack of information of the understory vegetation and, of the continuity of the vertical forest profile, which is crucial to identify FTs [10]. Discrete return LiDAR has proven to be effective in estimating parameters that are useful to predict vertical structure, such as tree canopy bulk density [15,16], base height [15,16,17], and cover [18], in addition to sub-canopy estimates of shrubs and other lateral fuels (e.g., tree seedlings and saplings) [19]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.