Abstract
Two orthotic devices commonly prescribed as arch supports were studied to evaluate their efficacy in stabilizing the foot. Fourteen cadaveric feet were mounted in a loading frame, and an axial load of 222, 445, or 667 N was applied while three-dimensional positions of the talus, calcaneus, navicular, and first metatarsal were monitored with a magnetic tracking system. Feet were tested with and without the use of two commonly prescribed arch supports. The two indices used to assess arch stabilization were arch height and joint rotation. Joint rotations consistently increased on load application. Significant differences were observed with Inserts 1 and 2 in metatarsal talar abduction, dorsiflexion and eversion, calcaneal talar eversion, and talar tibial dorsiflexion. Arch height significantly increased with both inserts. Contrary to previously published results, the arch supports that were studied provided measurable improvement in arch stability in a simulated standing at ease position.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
