Abstract

When localization methods used in reservoir history matching were introduced from outside the oil and gas industry, the differences between data assimilation for other industries and reservoir history matching were not considered. However, these differences can be extremely important when considering the validity of these methods. This problem is discussed within the context of the roles of covariance localization in detail in this paper.This paper starts with discussion of relations between two significant problems, ill-posedness and spurious correlations, and their solution methods. This analysis leads to a conclusion about two appropriate roles of the covariance localization method. This conclusion is used to validate the cross-covariance localization methods used in reservoir simulation.In addition, for the cross-covariance localization in reservoir history matching, there are many different processes, especially different correlation functions, proposed by different authors. This makes it difficult to choose a proper method when solving history matching or data assimilation problems. The performance of different cross-covariance localization correlation functions is also analyzed theoretically and experimentally in this paper.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.