Abstract

Compared with the commonest geosynthetics-reinforced soil structures, layered geogrids–sand–clay reinforced (LGSCR) structures (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China) can replace granular materials with clay as the primary backfill material. Up until now, the performance of LGSCR structures under triaxial compression has been unclear. In this paper, the discrete element method was used to simulate the triaxial compression test on the LGSCR samples. Based on the particle flow software PFC3D, three types of cluster particle-simulated sand and the reinforced joints of the geogrid were constructed by secondary development. The effects of the geogrid embedment in sand layers, the number and thickness of sand layers in relation to the deviatoric stress, and the axial strain and the shear strength index of the LGSCR samples were analyzed. The results showed that laying the sand layers in the samples can improve their post-peak strain-softening characteristics and increase their peak strengths under a high confining pressure. A geogrid embedment in sand layers can further enhance the ductility and peak strength of the samples, and in terms of the shear strength index, there is a 41.6% to 54.8% increase in the apparent cohesion of the samples.

Highlights

  • The commonest geosynthetics-reinforced soil (GRS) structures that embed geosynthetics in the soil have been widely used in practical engineering

  • As clay is one of the most abundant and inexpensive building materials, if the modified clay available on-site can be used as the backfill material of GRS structures, the cost can be reduced and the environmental impact associated with the disposal of the excavated soil can be lessened [6,7]

  • The researchers conducted a series of laboratory triaxial compression tests with sand specimens reinforced with nonwoven geotextiles and the results showed that the deviatoric stress increased at an approximately linear rate and tended to plateau

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The commonest geosynthetics-reinforced soil (GRS) structures that embed geosynthetics in the soil have been widely used in practical engineering. The backfill material is one of the main components of GRS structures and accounts for 30–40% of their cost [1]. The existing design specifications generally consider free-draining granular substances as the backfill material in the reinforced region [2,3,4,5]. As clay is one of the most abundant and inexpensive building materials, if the modified clay available on-site can be used as the backfill material of GRS structures, the cost can be reduced and the environmental impact associated with the disposal of the excavated soil can be lessened [6,7]. When clay is used as the backfill material for the commonest

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call