Abstract

This paper presents a co mparative analysis of launch and Earth departure strategies for human Mars missions. A variety of Earth departure architectures are analyzed with regard to their trans -Mars injection capabilities (performance surrogate metric) and equipment and operational requirements (cost surrogate metric); it is assumed that aerocapture and chemical propulsion are used for all maneuvers in Mars vicinity for all architectures . The architectures are based on chemical propulsion (custom stages or Ares V Earth Departure Sta ge) as well as nuclear thermal propulsion. Consideration is also given to the impact of different Earth departure options on Mars aerocapture and Mars entry, descent and landing. The comparative aspect of the analysis consists of an iso -TMI mass analysis f or the different options. Results of the set of architectures indicate that while chemical Earth departure strategies results in a 30 – 50 % increase in the number if Ares V launches required per mission, the associated additional marginal cost may be outw eighed by the cost of developing and maintaining a nuclear thermal propulsion capability, as well as the increased marginal cost of nuclear thermal propulsion stages. In addition, chemical Earth departure strategies side -step the sensitive issue of space n uclear applications that would be associated with nuclear thermal propulsion.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.