Abstract
Introduction A proportional relationship between the maxillary and mandibular teeth size is required for achieving good finish with proper overjet and overbite postorthodontic treatment. The aims and objectives of this study were to determine the anterior and overall Bolton's ratio in Nepalese population, to compare Bolton's ratio between subjects with normal occlusion, Class I malocclusion, and Class II malocclusion, to compare these results with Bolton's norm, and to determine the frequency of clinically significant (beyond 2 SD) tooth size discrepancy compared to Bolton's norm. Materials and Methods The study models of the subjects with normal occlusion and Angle's Class I malocclusion and Class II malocclusion and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were retrieved from department archives. An electronic digital caliper was used to measure mesiodistal tooth size of the maxillary and mandibular teeth anterior to the second molars. The study sample of 120 study models consisted of the normal occlusion group (n = 31), Class I malocclusion group (n = 47), and Class II malocclusion group (n = 42). These measurements were then used to obtain Bolton's ratio in three groups of subjects. Bolton's ratio of study groups was compared with each other and with Bolton's original ratio. Results The differences in tooth size ratio of the study groups were not significant statistically, when the groups were compared on the basis of malocclusion or gender. Statistically significant differences were exclusively observed between the study groups and Bolton's original sample for the anterior ratio. The frequency of the clinically significant tooth size ratio discrepancy was lower for the overall ratio (9.1%) compared to the anterior ratio (22.5%). Conclusions Bolton's analysis on the Nepalese population sample shows that there was no significant difference observed on the anterior and overall tooth size ratios when these were compared based on Angle's malocclusion classes or gender. The clinically significant anterior tooth size discrepancy was more prevalent than that of the overall ratio.
Highlights
A proportional relationship between the maxillary and mandibular teeth size is required for achieving good finish with proper overjet and overbite postorthodontic treatment. e aims and objectives of this study were to determine the anterior and overall Bolton’s ratio in Nepalese population, to compare Bolton’s ratio between subjects with normal occlusion, Class I malocclusion, and Class II malocclusion, to compare these results with Bolton’s norm, and to determine the frequency of clinically significant tooth size discrepancy compared to Bolton’s norm
A proportional relationship between the maxillary and mandibular tooth size is required for achieving good finish with proper overjet and overbite postorthodontic treatment [1]. e absence of tooth size discrepancy had been considered the seventh key to normal occlusion [2]. e presence of tooth size discrepancy should be identified during the initial diagnosis, and treatment planning stage and appropriate mechanism should be applied for resolving the discrepancy
Due to the selection bias in Bolton’s study, Bolton’s ratio may differ in the subjects with malocclusions and in different population groups [8,9,10,11,12]. e results from the previous studies on the interarch tooth discrepancy based on the malocclusions and in different racial groups are not in concordance
Summary
A proportional relationship between the maxillary and mandibular tooth size is required for achieving good finish with proper overjet and overbite postorthodontic treatment [1]. e absence of tooth size discrepancy had been considered the seventh key to normal occlusion [2]. e presence of tooth size discrepancy should be identified during the initial diagnosis, and treatment planning stage and appropriate mechanism should be applied for resolving the discrepancy. E aims and objectives of this study were to determine the anterior and overall Bolton’s ratio in Nepalese population, to compare these ratios between subjects with normal occlusion, Class I malocclusion, and Class II malocclusion, to compare these results with Bolton’s norm, and to determine the frequency of clinically significant (beyond 2 SD) tooth size discrepancy compared to Bolton’s norm. One-way ANOVA showed that there was no significant difference in the anterior and overall ratio between the groups when compared on the basis of gender or Angle’s malocclusion (Tables 4 and 5). A significant difference, limited to the anterior ratio only was observed between the normal occlusion and Class II malocclusion of the present study group and Bolton’s original sample (Table 6). A significant difference, limited to the anterior ratio only was observed between the normal occlusion and Class II malocclusion of the present study group and Bolton’s original sample (Table 6). e frequency of clinically significant (mean ± 2 SD) discrepancy was higher for the anterior ratio (22.5%) compared to the overall ratio (9.1%). e clinically significant anterior ratio discrepancy
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
