Abstract

In the context of the scope, time, cost, and quality constraints, failure is not uncommon in project management. While small projects have 70% chances of success, large projects virtually have no chance of meeting the quadruple constraints. While there is no dearth of research on project risk management, the manifestation of barriers to project risk management is a less dwelt topic. The success of project management is oftentimes based on the understanding of barriers to effective risk management, application of appropriate risk management methodology, proactive leadership to avoid barriers, workers’ attitude, adequate resources, organizational culture, and involvement of top management. This paper represents various risk categories and barriers to risk management in domestic and international projects through literature survey and feedback from project professionals. After analysing the various modelling methods used in project risk management literature, interpretive structural modelling (ISM) and MICMAC analysis have been used to analyse interactions among the barriers and prioritize them. The analysis indicates that lack of top management support, lack of formal training, and lack of addressing cultural differences are the high priority barriers, among many others.

Highlights

  • A project is defined as a series of related activities with a well-defined set of desired end results (Fan et al 2008)

  • The interpretive structural modelling (ISM) model indicates that barriers like lack of top management support, lack of formal training, and cultural difference are the top priority barriers which have an effect on other barriers

  • The MICMAC analysis concludes that barriers like lack of top management support and cultural difference which appear in the fourth quadrant are the key barriers and management has to pay attention to get quick and sustainable results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A project is defined as a series of related activities with a well-defined set of desired end results (Fan et al 2008). Han et al (2008) claimed that overseas projects tend to have a high possibility of loss/failure compared to domestic projects. High levels of risk are considered to be a significant obstacle for project success (Zwikael and Sadeh 2007). Zwikael et al (2013) defined risk as a scenario in which a project suffers a damaging effect. Risk management becomes an integral part of project management (Isaac 1995; Han et al 2008; Elkington and Smallman 2002). Risk management is very crucial for any project to complete successfully without compromising on the quadruple constraints of scope, cost, schedule, and quality (Yazid et al 2014). Risk management is very crucial for any project to complete successfully without compromising on the quadruple constraints of scope, cost, schedule, and quality (Yazid et al 2014). Miller and Lessard (2001) proposed that understanding and managing

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call