Abstract
Bird embryos may be regarded as developing in their thermo-neutral zone, at rest, and stay in the egg for a fixed period of time until hatching. It is therefore interesting to investigate if they follow the same ‘rule’ set for adult homeotherms, which states that, within a taxonomically or functionally defined category such as mammals or birds, the number of heart beats throughout the life span ( s L) is more or less constant. This rule stems from the allometric relationships between heart rate ( f H) and body mass ( m B) and between s L and m B. As a step towards understanding the general allometric nature of avian embryonic physiology we analyzed the f H values of avian embryos in relation to their incubation span ( s I). Data from 30 species were selected from the scientific literature for the analyses. Values obtained from invasive methods which were judged to grossly alter natural incubation conditions, or from undefined or unmatched temperature conditions were not used. These include most values obtained below the first 30% of the incubation. Also, data obtained after internal pipping were discarded since hatching activity influences them. Values for s I and egg mass ( m E) as representatives of embryonic mass were also collected. Embryonic f H was normalized to 70.1–80% s I. At 20.1–30% s I it was only 85% of the value at 70.1–80% s I and increased to a plateau at about 50.1–60% s I. It was almost constant among species between 50.1 and 60% s I and pre-internal pipping (PIP) time and thus, the mean f H value between 50.1 and 60% s I and between 90.1 and 100% excluding pipped eggs ( f̄ H) was taken as a representative value for each given species. The f̄ H (min −1) and the corresponding s I (days) values for the 30 species, scaled with m E (g) as follows: f̄ H=371.1 · m E −0.112 and: s I=12.29 · m E +0.209. Both powers were significantly different from 0. The product of f̄ H and s I ( f̄ H · s I), representing the total number of heartbeats throughout the incubation, scaled with m E for the entire data set as follows: f̄ H · s I=6.565 · 10 +6 · m E +0.096, where the +0.096 power is significantly different from 0. Values for f̄ H · s I from embryos of altricial birds tended to concentrate at the low m E end of the plot while those of the precocial ones tended towards the high end. Separate analyses showed that the m E power for the combined altricial and semi-altricial species (ASA), and the combined precocial and semi precocial species (PSP), of log f̄ H · s I against log m E regressions, were both insignificantly different from 0. Thus, means of f̄ H · s I for ASA and PSP were calculated. The mean ASA value of 7.27 · 10 +6 heartbeats for f̄ H · s I, was significantly different from the mean PSP value of 10.93 · 10 +6. The difference of 3.66 · 10 +6 (33.5%) heartbeats can be attributed to either the more advanced stage of the PSP hatchlings at hatch, to the larger m E values of these hatchlings, to the difference in water fraction of the hatchlings or all. The result of a linear regression of f̄ H · s I against the rate of s I completion (the inverse of incubation span, f I; day −1) was: f̄ H · 10 −6=0.205+3.940 · s I −1. Thus, the faster is the average rate of development accomplished per day (shorter incubation) the higher is daily heart rate. Data tended to cluster such that large eggs, mostly of the PSP type with relatively low f̄ H, complete 2–4% of their incubation per day, while small, ASA type eggs with relatively high f̄ H, complete 6–8% of their incubation time per day. We conclude that, at this stage of knowledge, the data is insufficient to resolve whether the different modes of hatch stage alone can explain differences in the total number of heartbeats throughout embryonic life among all bird species, or egg mass and water content differences contribute variability. This should be investigated on a larger sample of species in more depth.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.