Abstract

Periodic cardiac movement may expose the heart to radiation field induced damage, leading to radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD). Studies have proven that delineation of the heart based on planning CT fails to show the real margin of the substructures and a compensatory margin should be applied. The purpose of this study was to quantify the dynamic changes and the compensatory extension range by breath-hold and electrocardiogram gated 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D-MRI), which had the advantage of discriminating soft tissues. Eventually, 15 patients with oesophageal or lung cancers were enrolled, including one female and nine males aged from 59 to 77 years from December 10th, 2018, to March 4th, 2020. The displacement of the heart and its substructures was measured through a fusion volume and the compensatory expansion range was calculated by expending the boundary on the planning CT to that of the fusion volume. The differences were tested through the Kruskal-Wallis H test and were considered significant at a two-side P<0.05. The extent of movement of heart and its substructures during one cardiac cycle were approximately 4.0-26.1 millimetre (mm) in anterior-posterior (AP), left-right (LR), and cranial-caudal (CC) axes, and the compensatory margins should be applied to planning CT by extending the margins by 1.7, 3.6, 1.8, 3.0, 2.1, and 2.9 centimetres (cm) for pericardium; 1.2, 2.5, 1.0, 2.8, 1.8, and 3.3 cm for heart; 3.8, 3.4, 3.1, 2.8, 0.9, and 2.0 cm for interatrial septum; 3.3, 4.9, 2.0, 4.1, 1.1, and 2.9 cm for interventricular septum; 2.2, 3.0, 1.1, 5.3, 1.8, and 2.4 cm for left ventricular muscle (LVM); 5.9, 3.4, 2.1, 6.1, 5.4, and 3.6 cm for antero-lateral papillary muscle (ALPM); and 6.6, 2.9, 2.6, 6.6, 3.9, and 4.8 cm for postero-medial papillary muscle (PMPM) in anterior, posterior, left, right, cranial, and caudal directions, respectively. Periodic cardiac activity causes obvious displacement of the heart and its substructures, and the motion amplitude of substructures differs. Extending a certain margin as the compensatory extension to represent the organs at risk (OAR) and then limiting the dose-volume parameters could be performed in clinical practice.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call