Abstract
In 1999 the US National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) implemented regulations to limit harbor porpoise Phocoena phocoena incidental bycatch in US waters of the northwestern Atlantic. This effort was called the Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan (HPTRP) and included a mixture of time-area closures, pinger and other gear modification requirements, a pinger training program, and outreach and education efforts. This paper focuses on the plan from January 1999 to May 2010 and examines trends in bycatch patterns, compliance with the plan, enforcement of the plan requirements, and changes in the primary fisheries involved in harbor porpoise bycatch. Over the course of the plan harbor porpoise bycatch dropped in the first few years, increased to unacceptable levels during the middle years, and moderated in the later years of the plan. Changes in fishing effort and distribution of key fisheries played a large role in decreasing the bycatch in much of the Mid-Atlantic and also in increasing bycatch in Southern New England and off the coast of New Jersey. The pattern in compliance levels had an inverse relationship with bycatch levels, with better compliance and lower bycatch in early and late years, though compli- ance was generally poor even when at its best. Enforcement of HPTRP regulations was not well documented, but, from available compliance data, it appears that what enforcement did occur was not sufficient to improve compliance. Given poor compliance with pinger requirements, these requirements have not resulted in the expected reduction in bycatch.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.