Abstract

BackgroundThe prostate gland represents a multifaceted system in which prostate epithelia and stroma have distinct physiological roles. To understand the interaction between stroma and glandular epithelia, it is essential to delineate the gene expression profiles of these two tissue types in prostate cancer. Most studies have compared tumor and normal samples by performing global expression analysis using a mixture of cell populations. This report presents the first study of prostate tumor tissue that examines patterns of differential expression between specific cell types using laser capture microdissection (LCM).MethodsLCM was used to isolate distinct cell-type populations and identify their gene expression differences using oligonucleotide microarrays. Ten differentially expressed genes were then analyzed in paired tumor and non-neoplastic prostate tissues by quantitative real-time PCR. Expression patterns of the transcription factors, WT1 and EGR1, were further compared in established prostate cell lines. WT1 protein expression was also examined in prostate tissue microarrays using immunohistochemistry.ResultsThe two-step method of laser capture and microarray analysis identified nearly 500 genes whose expression levels were significantly different in prostate epithelial versus stromal tissues. Several genes expressed in epithelial cells (WT1, GATA2, and FGFR-3) were more highly expressed in neoplastic than in non-neoplastic tissues; conversely several genes expressed in stromal cells (CCL5, CXCL13, IGF-1, FGF-2, and IGFBP3) were more highly expressed in non-neoplastic than in neoplastic tissues. Notably, EGR1 was also differentially expressed between epithelial and stromal tissues. Expression of WT1 and EGR1 in cell lines was consistent with these patterns of differential expression. Importantly, WT1 protein expression was demonstrated in tumor tissues and was absent in normal and benign tissues.ConclusionsThe prostate represents a complex mix of cell types and there is a need to analyze distinct cell populations to better understand their potential interactions. In the present study, LCM and microarray analysis were used to identify novel gene expression patterns in prostate cell populations, including identification of WT1 expression in epithelial cells. The relevance of WT1 expression in prostate cancer was confirmed by analysis of tumor tissue and cell lines, suggesting a potential role for WT1 in prostate tumorigenesis.

Highlights

  • The prostate gland represents a multifaceted system in which prostate epithelia and stroma have distinct physiological roles

  • We utilized very stringent criteria - to be considered present, the transcript had to receive a "Present" call on all three samples from that tissue type. 6946 of the 22215 probes on the array were present in all three sample pairs for at least one of the two cell groups and half of them (3452 genes) were significantly expressed in both epithelial and stromal tissue

  • Of the growth control genes identified, we examined those known to be important in prostate tumorigenesis such as the chemokines chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) and chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13) and members of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling pathways including insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), IGF-IR, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), and fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 (FGFR-3) [25,26,27]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The prostate gland represents a multifaceted system in which prostate epithelia and stroma have distinct physiological roles. The prostate gland is composed primarily of epithelial and interstitial stromal cells. Communication between these cell types is important for normal development, and for prostate tumorigenesis [3]. The surrounding adjacent stromal cells, which are a mixture of fibroblasts, smooth muscle, endothelial, nerve, and inflammatory cells [4,6,7], influence the growth and development of prostate cancer epithelial cells and affect androgen responsiveness [8]. As such...., microarray analyses comparing these "tumor" with "normal" samples are difficult to interpret, since gene expression in tumor epithelial cells was diluted by the inclusion of adjacent stromal cells in the analysis, leading to ambiguous results. A true assessment of differential gene expression in tumor tissue requires cell-specific comparisons

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call