Abstract

The research and development of autonomous vehicle (AV) technology have been gaining ground globally. However, a few studies have performed an in-depth exploration of the contributing factors of crashes involving AVs. This study aims to predict the severity of crashes involving AVs and analyze the effects of the different factors on crash severity. Crash data were obtained from the AV-related crash reports presented to the California Department of Motor Vehicles in 2019 and included 75 uninjured and 18 injured accident cases. The points-of-interest (POI) data were collected from Google Map Application Programming Interface (API). Descriptive statistics analysis was applied to examine the features of crashes involving AVs in terms of collision type, crash severity, vehicle movement preceding the collision, and degree of vehicle damage. To compare the classification performance of different classifiers, we use two different classification models: eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Classification and Regression Tree (CART). The result shows that the XGBoost model performs better in identifying the injured crashes involving AVs. Compared with the original XGBoost model, the recall and G-mean of the XGBoost model combining POI data improved by 100% and 11.1%, respectively. The main features that contribute to the severity of crashes include weather, degree of vehicle damage, accident location, and collision type. The results indicate that crash severity significantly increases if the AVs collided at an intersection under extreme weather conditions (e.g., fog and snow). Moreover, an accident resulting in injuries also had a higher probability of occurring in areas where land-use patterns are highly diverse. The knowledge gained from this research could ultimately contribute to assessing and improving the safety performance of the current AVs.

Highlights

  • (3) autonomous vehicle (AV) technology can assist the driver in completing the driving task to a certain extent, it may affect the driver

  • E optimal Classification and Regression Tree (CART) and XGBoost models are established after parameter tuning. en, the two models are tested on the same testing data to compare the predicted results

  • E accuracy, recall, and G-mean results for the two modes are shown in Table 5, in which we can see that the XGBoost model performed better than the CART model, thereby reflecting the stability of XGBoost

Read more

Summary

Literature Review

Most previous studies on AV technology safety rely mainly on evaluating drivers’ performance and behavior in a simulated environment and developing the performance of autonomous driving systems in a closed field environment. Reliable points-of-interest (POI) data can be collected from anywhere globally, providing a broad space for detailed accident detection [26] These POI data may not be the typical factors used in traditional traffic accident analysis, they are specific data on land-use factors with precise location information [27]. They are expected to be highly correlated with traffic accidents in the macro- and microaspects. E primary purpose of this study is to use the XGBoost model incorporating POI data to predict the severity of crashes involving AVs and investigate the effects of the different factors on crash severity.

Data Preparation
Methodology
Results and Discussion
Summary and Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call