Abstract

The design of elements which exert pivotal effects on leisurely physical activity (LPA) in open space is an important part of urban development. However, little research has been done about the influence and discrepancies of those elements in different types of open space. To research these issues and to guide the design of urban open space, a survey from 8 open spaces (2 curtilage, 2 neighborhood squares (NS), 2 parks, and 2 campus) is conducted and a questionnaire is administered. Simultaneous analysis of several groups (SASG) of Structure equation model (SEM) is used, and the effects and discrepancies are acquired. In addition to this situation, interval type 2 (IT2) fuzzy hybrid decision making model is proposed in the second analysis. In this framework, IT2 fuzzy decision-making trial, evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), and IT2 fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) methods are used. The results show that the influence relationships between elements and LPA did exist in four groups. Another important conclusion is that there were discrepancies of influence among different space groups. Physical environment (PE) has the greatest influence on LPA in the curtilage, whereas facilities exert the most effect in NS group. Additionally, amenities only have significant impact in parks and facilities only exercise remarkable influence on duration on campus. In addition to them, it is also identified that key design elements are presented for different types of space and that design strategy is provided through 4 specific examples.

Highlights

  • Public health policies aim to maintain a healthy life and to protect people from diseases [1,2,3].There are a number of practices that are necessary to increase public health [4,5,6]

  • interval type 2 (IT2) fuzzy hybrid decision making model is proposed in the second analysis

  • This study focused on physical activity to increase public health

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Public health policies aim to maintain a healthy life and to protect people from diseases [1,2,3]. In addition to the mentioned issue, multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) are approaches used for this purpose in the literature With methods such as analytic hierarchy process (AHP), analytic network process (ANP), and DEMATEL, it is possible to identify the most important among the different alternatives [20,21,22,23]. It is thought that the policy recommendations of this study can be more appropriate In addition to this condition, structural equation modeling, IT2 fuzzy DEMATEL, and IT2 fuzzy TOPSIS methods are used together firstly in this study regarding the evaluation of environmental activities for developing the public health investments and policies. In the fourth part of the study, the details of the two different analyzes are given In this framework, both the structural equation model and the analysis made with IT2 fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods are shared.

Literature Review
Materials and Methods
Results
Analysis Results of Structural Equation Method
Analysis Results of Fuzzy MCDM Approaches
Relation
Curtilage
Neighborhood Squares
Campus
Conclusions
Duration of your LPA
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call