Abstract

The advent of Covid-19 provided an enormous academic and logistical challenge to almost all academic institutions in the United States and around the world. As a precautionary measure surrounding the novel coronavirus and in line with recommendations from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at that time (spring 2020), most higher education institutions in the United States shut down campuses and completed the second half of the spring 2020 semester virtually. During the fall 2020 semester, when relatively more was known about the virus, some institutions started with face-to-face classes but had to switch to virtual learning after noticing a spread of the coronavirus on their campuses. Others adopted a blended approach that supplements face-to-face meetings with virtual learning synchronously or asynchronously. Whichever approach adopted in place of the traditional face-to-face meetings did not necessarily solve the challenge faced by Engineering Technology programs, which typically infuse hands-on learning in most of the courses in their curriculum. Due to the applied nature of engineering technology, it is important to ensure that students stay engaged with creative ways to learn by doing. And to ensure that the students do not miss critical course content in virtual and blended engineering technology courses, it is vital that the students maintain high interactions with online resources such as class video recordings. This paper reviews students’ patterns of interactions with course videos to assess its impact on the academic success of engineering technology students in some upper-level blended courses delivered during the spring and fall 2020 semesters.

Highlights

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has created many necessary transitions and adjustments in all aspects of life

  • The Global Supply Chain Management (GSM) course is designated as a junior/senior-level course and it is open to Engineering Technology (ET) and Engineering students

  • Besides Industrial Engineering Technology students who take it as a required course, all other students take it as an elective

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has created many necessary transitions and adjustments in all aspects of life. The hands-on nature of ET programs meant that instructors had to be more creative at providing a tangible and palpable experience for ET students even if it is delivered virtually This is one of the reasons why blended courses, which deliver some course content virtually and the remaining as in-person (face-to-face), were prioritized for face-to-face learning at the Engineering Management, Systems and Technology department at the University of Dayton. This allowed students the chance to still get the extremely important laboratory experience that ET curricula provide. The level of engagement is defined as the percentage of time that a class recording was reviewed or played by a student

What is blended learning?
Benefits of blended learning
Challenges of blended learning
Student engagement
Results and discussions
Conclusion
Limitation of the study
Authors
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.