Abstract

The Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) is a major endoscopic scoring system used to assign a status of mucosal inflammation and disease activity to patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Using interobserver reliability (IOR), this study clarified the difficulties for endoscopic observers imposed by MES parameters used for the endoscopic evaluation of UC in histological remission. First, 42 endoscopists of four observer groups examined each MES parameter, which were evaluated from endoscopically obtained images of 100 cases as Grade 0 or 1 of the Nancy histological index of histopathological inflammation. Then, IOR was assessed using multiple κ statistics for each finding of MES. The results showed that IOR among all the observers was slight or fair for all the parameters, indicating a low IOR. The experts of the UC practice group had “moderate” or higher IOR for seven of the nine parameters, whereas “slight” or “fair” results were found for all parameters by the trainee group. The IOR for each MES parameter was calculated separately for the observer groups. All the groups showed “slight” or “fair” for “Erythema” and “Decreased vascular pattern”. Large differences between the endoscopists were found in the IOR for the MES parameters in UC in histological remission. Even among UC practice experts, the IOR was low for “Erythema” and “Decreased vascular pattern”.

Highlights

  • The values of interobserver reliability (IOR) calculated for all observers (42 persons) were calculated for the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) parameters (Table 1) as described below

  • In light of that possibility, we investigated the rate of agreement of endoscopic findings for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in the histological remission phase among endoscopic observers

  • Large differences were found in the IOR of the MES parameters used by endoscopists for endoscopic evaluation of UC in the histological remission phase

Read more

Summary

Study Design and Ethics

R-36-7J), conducted in accordance with the ethical principles stipulated in the Declaration of Helsinki, and registered with the University Hospital. Regarding the use of endoscopic photographs of patients, we provided a means to opt out instead of omitting informed consent, which was a way to guarantee an opportunity for research participants to notify and publish research information from our website

Collection of Endoscopic Images and Histological Evaluation
Observers for IOR Evaluation
Method of Presenting
Outcomes
Statistical
Evaluation
Comparison of IORs among Observer Groups
Evaluation almost perfect
IORs of MES Parameters by Observer Group
Meaning of MES
Difficulties of Endoscopic Diagnosis and IOR in Image Diagnosis
Significance of Study Results
Limitations
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.