Abstract

Objective.Rapid stroke-type classification is crucial for improved prognosis. However, current methods for classification are time-consuming, require expensive equipment, and can only be used in the hospital. One method that has demonstrated promise in a rapid, low-cost, non-invasive approach to stroke diagnosis is electrical impedance tomography (EIT). While EIT for stroke diagnosis has been the topic of several studies in recent years, to date, the impact of electrode placements and arrangements has rarely been analyzed or tested and only in limited scenarios. Optimizing the location and choice of electrodes can have the potential to improve performance and reduce hardware cost and complexity and, most importantly, diagnosis time.Approach.In this study, we analyzed the impact of electrodes in realistic numerical models by (1) investigating the effect of individual electrodes on the resulting simulated EIT boundary measurements and (2) testing the performance of different electrode arrangements using a machine learning classification model.Main results.We found that, as expected, the electrodes deemed most significant in detecting stroke depend on the location of the electrode relative to the stroke lesion, as well as the role of the electrode. Despite this dependence, there are notable electrodes used in the models that are consistently considered to be the most significant across the various stroke lesion locations and various head models. Moreover, we demonstrate that a reduction in the number of electrodes used for the EIT measurements is possible, given that the electrodes are approximately evenly distributed.Significance.In this way, electrode arrangement and location are important variables to consider when improving stroke diagnosis methods using EIT.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call