Abstract

Abstract Much of the research into multipath detectionand mitigation has not considered the carrier phase delaybetween the line of sight (LOS) and reflected signals. Anew variable referred to as early late phase (ELP) hasrecently been proposed to exploit this phase difference. Ithas been found that in a receiver tracking the L1 GPSsignal, the probability of detecting multipath is lower whenthe carrier phase difference between the LOS and areflected signal is an integer multiple of p. Since thepseudorange error caused by the multipath’s presence is thehighest in this case, we propose to exploit the coexistenceof another GPS civilian signal, the L2C. We present ananalysis of ELP for the L1 and L2C signals, and a com-bination of both, for detecting multipath. The multipathdetection performance has been compared using probabil-ities of false alarm and detection. An ideal algorithmshould have lower probability of false alarm and higherprobability of detection. However, it has been found thatusing dual-frequency ELP increases both probabilities.Thus, receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves, andthe area under the ROC curves, have been used for effec-tive comparison. It has been found that the L2C signalindividually gives worse performance than L1 because ofits weaker signal strength. However, the combination of L1and L2C gives the best overall performance, and thus it canbe claimed that ELP using dual-frequency receivers is amore effective approach for detecting multipath.Keywords Multipath GPS L2C ELP Dual-frequency receiverIntroductionThe last decade or so has seen an increase in applicationsof GPS in urban and indoor applications, which hasencouraged extensive research activity in the field ofmultipath detection and mitigation. Algorithms widelycited are narrow correlators (Dierendonck et al. 1992),double-difference residuals (DDR) (Townsend and Fenton1994), the vision correlator (Fenton and Jones 2005) andthe multipath estimating delay locked loop (MEDLL)(Townsend et al. 2000). Since a reflected signal reachesthe receiver by a relatively longer path, it is delayed intime and also has a carrier phase difference with respectto the line of sight (LOS) signal (Hatch et al. 2007;Mubarak and Dempster 2008). The above algorithms (andmany others) only use the magnitude of the correlatoroutputs and hence do not exploit this phase difference. Anew parameter, called the ‘‘early late phase (ELP)’’, hasrecently been proposed for multipath detection and esti-mation (Mubarak and Dempster 2007). ELP is the phasedifference between the early and late correlator outputs,where the phase of a correlator output is equal to theinverse tangent of the Q-channel output divided by theI-channel output. It is higher in the presence of multipathand has been shown to be a useful discriminator to detectthe presence of multipath (Mubarak 2008).This paper first provides a brief description of ELP,followed by its analysis in the presence of multipath for theL1 and L2C signals, and the combination of both. Multi-path detection performance is then compared using prob-abilities of false alarm and detection. ROC curves and the

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.