Abstract

To analyse the clinical and therapeutic consequences of early treatment failure after bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillation therapy for carcinoma in situ of the bladder. A total of 115 patients with carcinoma in situ (Tis) of the bladder were treated by intravesical instillation of living BCG vaccine (Immun BCG Pasteur F). Twenty five patients had primary Tis and 90 had secondary Tis with synchronous or prior superficial papillary tumours. All papillary tumours were resected before instillation of BCG. All patients completed one series of 6 weekly instillations of 120 mg BCG. Twenty-two of 25 patients (88%) with primary Tis responded completely, with negative cytology and cystoscopy findings within a median follow-up period of 44 months. Three of the 25 (12%) had cytological evidence of disease within 9 months of therapy and were considered to be early treatment failures. One patient had muscle-invasive bladder cancer, one had Tis and invasive cancer of the prostatic urethra, and the last, in whom a second BCG course also failed, had Tis of both ureters. Seventy of 90 patients (78%) with secondary Tis had a complete response after treatment with BCG, with repeated negative cytology and cystoscopy examinations within a median follow-up time of 40 months. Twenty of the 90 (22%) with secondary Tis had positive cytology within 9 months after BCG therapy and were considered early treatment failures. Five of these 20 had a cystectomy, three for persistent Tis of the bladder and two for a solid urothelial carcinoma of the prostate. The remaining 15 early failures received a second course of BCG. Four of these 15 patients responded and the remaining 11 failed the second course. The 11 failures included two patients with multifocal T1 G3 bladder cancers. four with invasive bladder cancer, two with solid urothelial carcinomas of the prostatic urethra, and three with Tis of the upper urinary tract. According to these data, early treatment failure after 6 weekly instillations of 120 mg Immun BCG Pasteur F is an alarming signal which requires immediate re-assessment of the patient to exclude a muscle-invasive bladder cancer or an extravesical carcinoma in situ, either in the upper urinary tract or in the prostatic urethra.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.