Abstract
This study discusses a dispute between the Press Council (DP) and the National Board for Profession Certification (BNSP) over the authority to conduct journalist competency tests (UKW) using Hans Kelsen’s and Hans Kaviasky’s Theory of Hierarchy of Law. This research was conducted through a qualitative approach using a normative judicial method in analyzing the Constitutional Court’s Decision No.38/PPU-XIX/2021 concerning the authority to conduct journalist competency tests. Secondary data of this research was obtained through literature and document studies. This research found that there has been no final clarification on the settlement of the legal dispute between DP and BNSP over the authority to conduct journalist competency tests following the Constitutional Court’s Decision No. 38/PPU-XIX/2021 rejecting in full the applicants’ plea. The legal implication of the decision is that both DP and BNSP can continue to conduct journalist competency tests respectively.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
