Abstract

The subject of the article is to answer the question whether the perpetrator of a prohibited act under Art. 193 or 191 § 1a of the Criminal Code may be the owner of an apartment who undertakes the forced eviction from the apartment of tenants who have stopped paying for the apartment and whose tenancy has been terminated. In the doctrine and jurisprudence, it has already been settled in principle that the owner of the apartment may be responsible for the violation of the home life during the term of the contract between him and the aggrieved party. However, the issue of what the situation looks like in the event of an effective termination of the contract was not commented on in greater detail. This issue requires a closer look.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call