Abstract

The estimation of many spectral-based quantitative ultrasound parameters assumes that backscattered echo signals are from a stationary, incoherent scattering process. The accuracy of these assumptions in real tissue can limit the diagnostic value of these parameters and the physical insight about tissue microstructure they can convey. This work presents an empirical decision test to determine the presence of significant coherent contributions to echo signals and whether they are caused by low scatterer number densities or the presence of specular reflectors or scatterers with periodic spacing. This is achieved by computing parameters from echo signals that quantify stationary or nonstationary features related to coherent scattering, and then comparing their values to thresholds determined from a reference material providing diffuse scattering. The paper first presents a number of parameters with demonstrated sensitivity to coherent scattering and describes criteria to select those with the highest sensitivity using simulated and phantom-based echo data. Results showed that the echo amplitude signal-to-noise ratio and the multitaper-generalized spectrum were the parameters with the highest sensitivity to coherent scattering with stationary and nonstationary features, respectively. These parameters were incorporated into the reference-based decision test, which successfully identified regions in simulated and tissue-mimicking phantoms with different incoherent and coherent scattering conditions. When scatterers with periodic organization were detected, the combination of stationary and nonstationary analysis permitted the estimation of the mean spacing below and above the resolution limit imposed by the pulse size. Preliminary applications of this algorithm to human cervical tissue ex vivo showed correspondence between regions of B-mode images showing bright reflectors, tissue interfaces, and hypoechoic regions with regions classified as specular reflectors and low scatterer number density. These results encourage further application of the algorithm to more structurally complex phantoms and tissue.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call