Abstract
Abstract Steel–concrete composite columns are used extensively in modern buildings. Extensive research on composite columns in which structural steel section are encased in concrete have been carried out. In-filled composite columns, however have received limited attention compared to encased columns. In this paper a comparative study of 10, 20 and 30 storey Concrete Filled Steel Tube (CFT), R.C.C. and Steel building is done. Comparison of parameters like time period, displacement, base shear and load carrying capacity is done with steel and R.C.C structures. Result shows CFT building is good in load carrying capacity with small cross section of column.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
