Analysis of cerebral perfusion of leptomeningeal branch and perforating branch of unilateral middle cerebral artery with severe stenosis or occlusion based on multi-delay arterial spin labeling

Abstract

Objective: To compare the cerebral perfusion differences between the symptomatic patients and the asymptomatic patients with unilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) severe stenosis or occlusion by using three post labeling delays (PLD) of the three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) technique. Methods: The clinical characteristics and ASL data of the 27 patients with severe stenosis or occlusion of unilateral MCA (18 symptomatic, 9 asymptomatic) were prospectively enrolled from April 2018 to November 2019 in the Department of Radiology of China-Japan Friendship Hospital. There were 16 males and 11 females, age range from 29 to 85 (55±13) years. According to the symptoms, they were divided into symptomatic group (18 cases) and asymptomatic group (9 cases). The parameters of cerebral blood flow (CBF), mean cerebral blood flow (mCBF), arterial transit time (ATT) and arterial cerebral blood volume (aCBV) were obtained using the Cereflow software. One-way multivariate analysis of variance (one-way MANOVA) was used to compare the differences of cerebral perfusion parameters between symptomatic group and asymptomatic group, and between the affected side and the control side in the two groups. Two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the effects of symptoms, hemisphere (affected and control side), PLD times (1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 s) and the interaction between the two factors. Results: The CBF of the affected leptomeningeal branch and perforating branch of MCA in symptomatic group was lower than that in asymptomatic group [(36.8±10.2) ml·100 g-1·min-1 versus (46.6±13.9) ml·100 g-1·min-1, F(1, 75)=13.279, P=0.000 49; (32.3±8.3) ml·100 g-1·min-1 versus (36.2±7.5) ml·100 g-1·min-1, F (1, 75)=4.065, P=0.047], and there was no interaction between the symptom and PLD [F(2, 75) =0.061, P=0.940]. In the symptomatic group, the CBF of the leptomeningeal branch and perforating branch of MCA in affected side was lower than that in control side [(36.8±10.2) ml·100 g-1·min-1 versus (43.7±10.0) ml·100 g-1·min-1, F(1, 102)=12.559, P=0.000 59; (32.3±8.3) ml·100 g-1·min-1 versus (36.4±8.0) ml·100 g-1·min-1, F(1, 102)=6.493, P=0.012]. In the symptomatic group, the CBF of leptomeningeal branch of MCA when PLD was 2.5 s was 7.34 ml·100 g-1·min-1, which were higher than that when PLD of 1.5 s (95%CI: 0.72-13.9, P=0.03). There was no interaction between PLD and hemisphere [F(2, 102) =0.307, P=0.736]. Conclusions: The collateral circulation in the blood supply area of MCA in asymptomatic patients with severe unilateral MCA stenosis or occlusion is more abundant than that in symptomatic patients. ASL can be an effective technique for evaluating the cerebral perfusion of collateral circulation in patients with severe stenosis or occlusion of MCA.