Abstract

PT Adaro Indonesia is trying to adjust a vertical clearance under Tabalong Bridge 1 (unloaded) and Tabalong Bridge 2 (loaded) because the existing conditions still apply a minimum vertical clearance of 4 m. I t should be in accordance with latest Regulation of the Minister of Public Works No. 19/PRT/M/2011 that for vertical clearance above national road at least 5.1 m. This specification has not been met by the national road under the Tabalong 1 & 2 Bridges bec ause both bridges were built in the 90s. Therefore we need an engineering technique to overcome this. There are 2 alternative designs, namely lowering the elevation of the national road and increasing the elevation of the bridge's upper structure to mitiga te oversized vehicles so as not to hit the lower structure of the Tabalong bridge. In determining the selection of the best alternative designs in this research is based on two (2) things, non financial criteria with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and financial criteria with Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)/Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) method. This study uses a survey method by distributing questionnaires and interviews as a means of collecting primary data. In addition, previous research and consultant DED documents were used as a means of collecting secondary data. The AHP method is used to process primary data to produce a decision from a non financial aspect. While the LCC/BCR method is used to process secondary data to produce a decision from the financi al aspect . The results of the AHP analysis obtained that the synthesis value of the decision the option of lowering national roads was 85% and the bridge lifting option was 15% and the consistency ratio (CR) was 0.05 < 0.1. The consistency ratio below 0.1 shows that the questionnaire data from the respondents are consistent. The results of the analysis of Life Cycle Cost (LCC) obtained the option of lowering national roads where the LCC value is Rp. 44,877,651,669.27 more economical than the bridge lifting option. Then the results of the Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) analysis obtained the option of lowering national roads with a BCR value of 2.33 > 1 and NPV = Rp. 43,442,264,804.34 > 1 means that the option lowering national roads is feasible. While the bridge li fting option is obtained by analyzing the value of BCR = 0.98 < 1 and NPV = option is not feasible to implement.

Highlights

  • PT Adaro Indonesia has a hauling distance of ± 90 km which is located in Tabalong Regency and Balangan Regency, South Kalimantan Province

  • The five non-financial criteria are needed for the decision-making process using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, namely: making a synthesis matrix, normalizing the matrix, weighting values, synthesizing decisions and testing the consistency of questionnaire data. 2.3 AHP Analysis Results The best design alternative was obtained using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method based on non-financial criteria. 2.4 LCC/BCR Analysis From the two alternative designs, financial criteria analysis was carried out by processing secondary data to produce the best alternative using the Life Cycle Cost (LCC)/Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) method

  • Each of the two design alternatives will calculate the Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) to determine the feasibility of each design alternative. 2.5 LCC/BCR Analysis Results The best design alternative was obtained using the Life Cycle Cost (LCC)/Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) method based on financial criteria. 2.6 Comparison and Recommendation Results Comparing the results of the analysis of the two alternatives to obtain appropriate, effective and efficient decision recommendations from the results of the AHP and LCC/BCR analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

PT Adaro Indonesia has a hauling distance of ± 90 km which is located in Tabalong Regency and Balangan Regency, South Kalimantan Province. From the two options in this study, an analysis will be carried out to determine the alternative design of the vertical clearance design of the Tabalong Bridge based on non-financial and financial criteria. 2. Research Method There are several stages of analysis carried out in data processing in determining the alternative design for the vertical clearance of the Tabalong Bridge. 2.3 AHP Analysis Results The best design alternative was obtained using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method based on non-financial criteria. 2.4 LCC/BCR Analysis From the two alternative designs, financial criteria analysis was carried out by processing secondary data to produce the best alternative using the Life Cycle Cost (LCC)/Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) method. 2.5 LCC/BCR Analysis Results The best design alternative was obtained using the Life Cycle Cost (LCC)/Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) method based on financial criteria.

Conclusions and suggestions
Initial Cost
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call