Abstract

Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its precancerous lesion, advanced adenomas (AA), is critical to improve CRC incidence and prognosis. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs or miR) are promising non-invasive biomarkers for cancer detection. Our previous results showed that a plasma 6-miRNA signature (miR-15b-5p, miR-18a-5p, miR-29a-3p, miR-335-5p, miR-19a-3p and miR-19b-3p) could distinguish between CRC or AA and healthy individuals (controls). However, its diagnostic performance in serum is unknown. In this exploratory study we aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the 6-miRNA signature in serum samples in a cohort of individuals participating in Barcelona’s CRC Screening Programme. We prospectively collected serums from 264 faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive participants and total RNA was extracted. Finally, 213 individuals (CRC, 59, AA, 74, controls, 80) were included. MiRNA expression was quantified by real-time RT-qPCR and data analysis was performed by logistic regression. Faecal hemoglobin concentration (f(Hb)) from FIT of the same individuals was also considered. As previously described in plasma, serum from patients with AA or CRC presented significant differences in the 6-miRNA signature compared to controls. Moreover, when combined with f(Hb), the final signature showed high discriminative capacity to distinguish CRC from controls (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.88), and even AA (AUC = 0.81) that otherwise are poorly detected if we only consider f(Hb) (AUC = 0.64). Addition of the serum 6-miRNA signature to quantitative f(Hb) show high accuracy to detect patients with advanced colorectal neoplasia in average-risk individuals. A combination of these two non-invasive methods could be a good strategy to improve diagnostic performances of current CRC screening programmes.

Highlights

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most frequent cancer in Western countries and the second leading cause of cancer-related death [1]

  • Almost 90% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who are detected in an early stage survive, whereas only 12–13% of patients survive when detected with metastatic disease [2,3]

  • In enrolled 150 (70%) men and 63 (30%) woman within the age range of the CRC screening programme more detail, we enrolled 150 (70%) men and 63 (30%) woman within the age range of the CRC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most frequent cancer in Western countries and the second leading cause of cancer-related death [1]. AA represents a pertinent target lesion for a CRC screening test. Some strategies are available to screen CRC average-risk individuals including colonoscopy or non-invasive faecal occult blood tests, such as the faecal immunochemical test (FIT), each one of them have important disadvantages. FIT is non-invasive and shows quite accurate results in CRC detection but is compromised by low sensitivity (Sn) in detecting AA and a high ratio of false positive results [4]. Early detection of AA remains an unmet need since there is not an available test with promising diagnostic performance for these lesions. A blood-based test with high diagnostic performances for both CRC and AA would offer advantages compared to the current available strategies

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call