Abstract
Biogas upgrading is an important industrial process for producing biomethane, a sustainable energy source with low carbon footprint. There are three main solvent-based alternatives for biogas upgrading: water scrubbing, physical scrubbing and chemical scrubbing with amines. Though assessments have been published regarding which technologies are more cost-effective and energetically efficient, these often either neglect inspecting the impact of raw biogas concentrations and biomethane delivery pressures on the overall performance of the plant, or they do not consider that the separated CO2 has to be conditioned for transportation for properly fulfilling the requirements of BECCS (bioenergy with carbon capture and storage). In fact, many assessments of physical scrubbing processes forfeit CO2 recovery altogether. This work intends to rehabilitate physical scrubbing as an alternative for BECCS by showing that, depending on the conditions of the raw biogas, the requirements for biomethane delivery, and the cost of carbon taxes, biogas upgrading can be feasible by scrubbing either with amines or with organic solvents. We introduce a review on organic physical solvents for CO2 recovery, a simulation framework for the evaluation of energetical operational costs of biogas upgrading, and a simplified economic analysis. High biomethane delivery pressures and high CO2 concentrations in raw biogas benefit the use of physical solvents such as N-formyl-morpholine, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone and poly(ethylene glycol)dimethyl ether, whereas the opposite conditions are advantageous to aqueous monoethanolamine. Finally, the implementation of carbon taxes of around 10 USD/ton CO2 emitted are sufficient to increase the attractiveness of CO2 recovery as opposed to CO2 wasting.
Highlights
In past decades, the development of sustainable energy generation technologies has become an important asset in mitigating climate change and environmental degradation
We suggest that the performance of different biogas upgrading technologies and the selection of the optimal alternative will change as a function of the following external conditions: the raw biogas properties, the treated biomethane specifications and the value of the CO2 tax
An overview of the operating conditions and their effect on the en ergetic and economic performance of both physical scrubbing technol ogies Physical/Water absorption with CO2 Recovery (PWCR) and PW is presented in this subsection
Summary
The development of sustainable energy generation technologies has become an important asset in mitigating climate change and environmental degradation. These include technologies such as improved solar panels, efficient wind-powered equipment, hydrogen fuel cells and biogas production facilities [1]. Since biogas is produced biologically through anaerobic digestion of organic matter, both the nature of the digestate and the conditions of the biological fermentation will affect the composition of raw biogas [6,7,8].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
