Analysis and results of early revascularization in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena Introduction The time to diagnostic coronary angiography in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) is considered one of the main prognostic factors in patients at higher risk. Purpose Our aim is to know whether early coronary angiography modifies the prognosis of high-risk patients with NSTEACS and to compare it with performing this procedure later. Methods We include patients admitted to the coronary unit of a 3rd level hospital from January-2015 to December-2021 due to NSTEACS. We plan to examine whether the clinical characteristics of patients in whom early coronary angiography (ECA) is performed, the one performed in the first 24 hours from the onset of symptoms, differ from those in whom it is performed later. Likewise, we analyze the clinical results obtained according to the strategy. Results 811 patients were included (73.4% men and 26.6% women), with an average age of 65, in which 229 (28.2%) of them underwent early coronary angiography. Initially, we found more smokers (44.5% vs 32.8, p = 0.006), a higher frequency of risk electrocardiographic changes (ST decrease> 2 mm in 2 contiguous leads, transient ST segment elevation, left main stem pattern) (p = 0.000), greater need for inotropic drugs (14.5% vs 9.6%, p = 0.045), worse Killip-Kimball (KK) during hospital stay (p = 0.002), as well as higher frequency of cardiogenic shock (p = 0.005) among the patients in whom ECA was performed. Although in-hospital mortality was higher in patients who underwent ECA, no statistically significant difference was found. No differences were obtained in the other cardiovascular risk factors, previous history of acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, coronary revascularization, initial KK presentation, or post-catheterization LVEF. Conclusions In our study, we observed that in patients admitted for NSTEACS, we performed ECA more frequently in patients with a worse prognosis (pathological alterations in the initial ECG, greater frequency of support with inotropics and worse KK during hospital admission), without observing significant differences in in-hospital mortality or in post-catheterization LVEF. The results suggest that ECA improves the prognosis in the group with the worst clinical profile.