Abstract

This research presents a comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for classifying Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks within network traffic. We evaluated the performance of three algorithms: Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, and Random Forest, including their scaled-feature counterparts. The study utilized a robust methodology incorporating advanced data preprocessing, feature engineering, and Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) to address class imbalance. The models were rigorously tested using a cross-validation framework, assessing their accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Results indicated that the Random Forest algorithm outperformed the others, demonstrating superior predictive accuracy and consistency, albeit with higher computational costs. Logistic Regression, when feature-scaled, showed significant improvement in performance, highlighting the importance of data normalization in models sensitive to feature scaling. Decision Trees provided a quick and interpretable model, though slightly less accurate than the Random Forest. The research findings highlight the trade-offs between predictive performance and computational efficiency in selecting machine learning models for cybersecurity applications. The study contributes to the cybersecurity domain by elucidating the efficacy of ensemble techniques in DDoS attack classification and underscores the potential for model improvement through scaling and data balancing.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call