Analysis and comparison of electron radiation damage assessments in Cryo-EM by single particle analysis and micro-crystal electron diffraction.

Abstract

Electron radiation damage to macromolecules is an inevitable resolution limit factor in all major structural determination applications using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). Single particle analysis (SPA) and micro-crystal electron diffraction (MicroED) have been employed to assess radiation damage with a variety of protein complexes. Although radiation induced sidechain density loss and resolution decay were observed by both methods, the minimum dose of electron irradiation reducing high-resolution limit reported by SPA is more than ten folds higher than measured by MicroED using the conventional dose concept, and there is a gap between the attained resolutions assessed by these two methods. We compared and analyzed these two approaches side-by-side in detail from several aspects to identify some crucial determinants and to explain this discrepancy. Probability of a high energy electron being inelastically scattered by a macromolecule is proportional to number of layers of the molecules in its transmission path. As a result, the same electron dose could induce much more site-specific damage to macromolecules in 3D protein crystal than single particle samples. Major differences in data collection and processing scheme are the key factors to different levels of sensitivity to radiation damage at high resolution between the two methods. High resolution electron diffraction in MicroED dataset is very sensitive to global damage to 3D protein crystals with low dose accumulation, and its intensity attenuation rates at atomic resolution shell could be applied for estimating ratio of damaged and total selected single particles for SPA. More in-depth systematically radiation damage assessments using SPA and MicroED will benefit all applications of cryo-EM, especially cellular structure analysis by tomography.