Abstract
The article aims to summarise theoretical conclusions and practical results of studying the activities of local bodies on managing the development of rural social infrastructure in the Republic of Kazakhstan. In the article, the objective and subjective indicators characterising the efficiency of managing the rural social infrastructure in rural areas of the Mangystau Region for 2013 – 2017 have been analysed. Through the example of a statistical study of the dynamics of the social infrastructure elements and living standards, the features and problems related to the administrative measures that regulate the socio-economic development of auls in the region have been identified. Using the questionnaire survey, the satisfaction of rural residents in the Mangystau Region with the quality of their social infrastructure has been determined. It has been proved that now the subjective assessment of the efficiency of managing the rural social infrastructure is positively correlated (correlated) with the degree of efforts taken by the local administration to improve the quality of rural life. Currently, rural settlements of the Mangystau Region have an average level of social infrastructure development. However, in different areas, the level of residents’ satisfaction with it varies from very low to sufficient.
Highlights
It is extremely important to study the issues on managing the village social infrastructure due to the problem on achieving its residents’ well-being that is directly related to the quality of life of the population of any country
It can be argued that the village social infrastructure (VSI) is a comprehensive regional complex that includes a rural territory economically equipped for the life of people, organisations and institutions of the social and services sectors, as well as governing bodies ensuring the social well-being of the population working and living in this rural area
The Mangystau Region (MR) includes two cities (Aktau and Zhanaozen), five districts that consist of 42 rural regional districts, comprising 66 rural settlements (Table 1)
Summary
It is extremely important to study the issues on managing the village social infrastructure (hereinafter – the VSI) due to the problem on achieving its residents’ well-being that is directly related to the quality of life of the population of any country.The social infrastructure is a multidimensional phenomenon. It is extremely important to study the issues on managing the village social infrastructure (hereinafter – the VSI) due to the problem on achieving its residents’ well-being that is directly related to the quality of life of the population of any country. It can be argued that the VSI is a comprehensive regional complex that includes a rural territory economically equipped for the life of people, organisations and institutions of the social and services sectors, as well as governing bodies ensuring the social well-being of the population working and living in this rural area. In the most general form, the social infrastructure is the material and technical base for the social sectors of the society to fulfil their socially essential functions (Komarov, 2000).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
