Abstract

The emergence of digital learning formats influences the planning and structuring of digital teaching. Especially in times of the Corona Pandemic, when many universities remain closed, new digital learning concepts are emerging that can be integrated into face-to-face teaching in future. In this context, old teaching formats are often revised and questioned. But while technology only determines the form of collaboration, the real quality of learning depends on cognitive trials that the teacher addresses to the students. To classify these trials, a teacher can use Bloom's revised taxonomy, which ranks Learning Objectives in a six-level order and assumes a cumulative hierarchy: achieving a required Learning Objective level includes all lower levels. Especially in blended learning scenarios, such as a Flipped Classroom, this theory can be used to develop the course structure and to form exam questions. However, the applicability of the cumulative hierarchy is controversial in the literature and is rarely analysed in blended learning courses. Our goal is therefore to verify the cumulative hierarchy in a Flipped Classroom Course and derive recommendations for action. Therefore, we use a quantitative written survey. Since the analysis is based on the students' perceptions, these are verified by correlation analysis with the actual exam results and the awareness of contents and activities. Afterwards, the cumulative hierarchy is tested by regression analysis of the different levels of Learning Objectives. As a result, it could be confirmed for all levels, but not always by direct but often by indirect influences of other levels.

Highlights

  • The growing digitalization enriches all areas of daily life and increasingly reaches educational institutions

  • In our analysis, we investigate the cumulative hierarchy of Learning Objectives in a blended learning format

  • All Learning Objectives (LOs) except C6 Create correlate with the actual exam results of the corresponding level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The growing digitalization enriches all areas of daily life and increasingly reaches educational institutions. The first step of such a curricular design should be defining the Learning Objectives (LOs) and the Learning Outcome to be achieved (Bower et al 2010; Ferguson 1998; Houlden and Collier 1999). To develop clear and unequivocal course goals and to enable their assessment, the teacher can use a classification of LOs (Bloom et al 1956). A common taxonomy of Learning Objectives was developed by Bloom and revised by Anderson and Krathwohl, which has been used by multiple universities to analyze Learning Success so far The taxonomy assumes that Learning Objectives can be placed in a cumulative hierarchy, in which the achievement of more complex LOs necessarily involves all lower LOs (Krathwohl 2002).

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.