Abstract

AbstractTeaching and learning in science disciplines are dependent on multimodal communication. Earlier research implies that students may be challenged when trying to interpret and use different semiotic resources. There have been calls for extensive frameworks that enable analysis of multimodal texts in science education. In this study, we combine analytical tools deriving from social semiotics, including systemic functional linguistics (SFL), where the ideational, interpersonal, and textual metafunctions are central. In regard to other modes than writing—and to analyse how textual resources are combined—we build on aspects highlighted in research on multimodality. The aim of this study is to uncover how such a framework can provide researchers and teachers with insights into the ways in which various aspects of the content in multimodal texts are communicated through different semiotic resources. Furthermore, we aim to explore how different text resources interact and, finally, how the students, or authors of teaching resources, position themselves in relation to the subject. Data consist of one student text and one teaching resource text, both comprising drawn and written elements in combination with symbols. Our analyses of the student text suggest that the proposed framework can provide insights into students’ content knowledge and, hence, how construction of multimodal texts may be a useful tool for formative assessment. When it comes to teaching resources, the framework may be a useful tool for teachers when choosing resources, particularly in relation to students’ possibilities of meaning making when engaging with such texts, but also, as a basis for classroom discussions.

Highlights

  • IntroductionComplex processes, and the study of phenomena which cannot always be experienced directly by our senses

  • Science involves abstract concepts, complex processes, and the study of phenomena which cannot always be experienced directly by our senses

  • Language plays an important role in the communication of science, the scientific discourse is characterised by multimodality (Lemke, 1998; Kress et al, 2001), where students’ meaning making depends on their interaction with several semiotic resources (Danielsson, 2016; Jakobson et al, 2018; Kress et al, 2001; Lemke, 1998)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Complex processes, and the study of phenomena which cannot always be experienced directly by our senses. Abstract and complex phenomena are often described and explained through visual representations. Indicates that students require more guidance when interpreting such representations (Eilam, 2013). Whereas such visual representations are central to students’ meaning making in science, they are typically combined with other resources, such as writing and subject-specific symbols, in a multimodal orchestration (Kress et al, 2001). Seeing as the creation of multimodal texts has the potential to assist students in their meaning making of scientific concepts (Cheng et al, 2020; Tytler et al, 2018), analysis of such texts can provide insights into students’ reasoning (cf. formative assessment, Black & Wiliam, 2009)

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call