Abstract
Authorial identity construction is one of many professional rhetorical strategies employed by authors in academic review genres. Authors usually create a persona to represent themselves, their seniority in the field, and the community to which they belong. The author’s visibility is made possible through several rhetorical devices. Perhaps the most remarkable way of such authorial identity construction in the review article genre is self-mentions. The aims of this research are (1) to find out what types of self-mention are frequently used in review articles, (2) to determine the frequency of use and distribution of self-mentions in the review articles, and (3) to investigate the rhetorical function of self-mentions in the different analytical sections of the review articles. The data, drawn from a randomly selected corpus of thirty-two review articles, were analysed using WordSmith Tools Version 6. The findings indicated that first-person plural pronouns were more frequently used than singular pronouns in the whole corpus except in the two review texts. It was also observed that the frequency of occurrence for the exclusive and inclusive pronouns was very close to each other. Most importantly, the inclusive pronouns were used not only as a politeness strategy to appreciate the readers and keep the writers’ claims balanced but also as a persuasive tool to seek the readers’ agreement in the evaluation of research developments. This study revealed that authors construct various professional personas as a rhetorical strategy to carve their authorial identity and credibility in the review article genre. The findings of this study have pedagogical implications in the field of academic writing in applied linguistics as well as other disciplines.
Highlights
In recent years, the field of academic discourse analysis has paid increasing attention to authorial identity construction
It is worth noting that the current study focused on interactional metadiscourse, for these resources are at the heart of academic communication as a socio-rhetorical activity that provides authors of research genres a variety of ways to mark their presence, negotiates knowledge claims, and engages their readers
Hyland (2008) contends that the perspective of stance can be referred to as “the writer’s textual voice or community recognized personality” (p. 5). Stance features such as self-mentions may indicate the writer’s authorial identity in academic review genres, so we have focused on analysing self-mentions in the review article genre in Applied Linguistics
Summary
The field of academic discourse analysis has paid increasing attention to authorial identity construction. In the genre of academic reviews, identity construction is one of the key topics of study. Authorial identity construction is one of the main rhetorical strategies that interest genre analysts amongst the different available genres. Through this strategy, authors in research genres, in academic, review genres as one of the sub-branches of research genres (Swales, 2004), try to construct their ‘persona’ (i.e., authorial identity or voice) as a representation of themselves or their works, and to identify the community which they belong. The visibility of an author’s persona in academic review genres is made possible through several rhetorical strategies, one of which includes explicit self-mention markers, especially ‘first-person pronouns’ (i.e., ‘I,’ ‘we’)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
