Abstract

Differences exist among analysis results of agriculture monitoring and crop production based on remote sensing observations, which are obtained at different spatial scales from multiple remote sensors in same time period, and processed by same algorithms, models or methods. These differences can be mainly quantitatively described from three aspects, i.e. multiple remote sensing observations, crop parameters estimation models, and spatial scale effects of surface parameters. Our research proposed a new method to analyse and correct the differences between multi-source and multi-scale spatial remote sensing surface reflectance datasets, aiming to provide references for further studies in agricultural application with multiple remotely sensed observations from different sources. The new method was constructed on the basis of physical and mathematical properties of multi-source and multi-scale reflectance datasets. Theories of statistics were involved to extract statistical characteristics of multiple surface reflectance datasets, and further quantitatively analyse spatial variations of these characteristics at multiple spatial scales. Then, taking the surface reflectance at small spatial scale as the baseline data, theories of Gaussian distribution were selected for multiple surface reflectance datasets correction based on the above obtained physical characteristics and mathematical distribution properties, and their spatial variations. This proposed method was verified by two sets of multiple satellite images, which were obtained in two experimental fields located in Inner Mongolia and Beijing, China with different degrees of homogeneity of underlying surfaces. Experimental results indicate that differences of surface reflectance datasets at multiple spatial scales could be effectively corrected over non-homogeneous underlying surfaces, which provide database for further multi-source and multi-scale crop growth monitoring and yield prediction, and their corresponding consistency analysis evaluation.

Highlights

  • Space remote sensing technologies have been widely applied in the research field of agriculture for crop growth parameters estimation, crop growth condition monitoring, and yield evaluation [1,2,3]

  • The red cumulative distribution function (CDF) curve belonged to the distribution of the sequence of standardized spectral reflectance data, while the blue one was the empirical CDF curve, which belonged to the standard normal distribution

  • The current study demonstrates that the new proposed method integrated with parameter design into statistical model for data processing can quantitatively describe the differences between multi-source and multi-scale remote sensing observations, and effectively correct these differences based on probability theories and mathematical statistics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Space remote sensing technologies have been widely applied in the research field of agriculture for crop growth parameters estimation, crop growth condition monitoring, and yield evaluation [1,2,3]. Due to spatial heterogeneity in crop canopies and diversity of satellite observation systems, differences inevitably exist among analysing results of crop condition monitoring and yield estimation based on multiple remotely sensed observations, which are obtained at different spatial scales from multiple remote sensors during same time periods, and processed by same algorithms, models or methods. To meet the needs of quantitatively describing space distribution patterns and characteristics, and analysing and correcting differences of physical and mathematical properties and their spatial variations of remote sensing observations, which are obtained at multiple spatial scales from different remote sources, lots of research works have been done based on selecting or constructing statistical or theoretical models and algorithms for data processing [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. There are a lot of researches have been done to quantitatively analyse and correct the differences between multi-source and multi-scale spatial remote sensing observations and products [7,13,14,15,16,17,18]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call