Abstract
Based on the finite element limit analysis method, the stability of the face in case of active failure under three constitutive models, the Mohr-Coulomb model (MC), the modified Cambridge model (MCC) and the Drucker-Prager model (DP), were analyzed. The ultimate support pressure of the face and the influence of factors such as different burial depth ratios (C/D), cohesion (c) and friction angle (φ) in the MC model are also discussed. The results show that the safety factor obtained by the MCC model under the same support pressure is always smaller than that of the MC model, and the difference is the largest when there is no support pressure. As the support pressure increases, it will gradually approach the MC model. When the support pressure is small, the safety factor obtained by the DP model is larger than the MC model, but when the support pressure is large, it is smaller than the MC model, and the final difference tends to be stable. It is necessary to select an appropriate constitutive model according to different rock masses in practical engineering. The self-stabilizing performance of the face is not affected by C/D, and the ultimate support pressure will increase with the increase of C/D, decrease linearly with the increase of cohesion, and decrease with the increase of friction angle. When the friction angle is small, the ultimate support pressure is greatly affected by C/D, and when the friction angle is large, it is hardly affected by C/D.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.