Abstract

BackgroundThree-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) is an attractive option in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the potential factors influencing the accuracy of 3DUS in comparison with cone-beam CT (CBCT) in IGRT for PCa patients haven’t been clearly identified.MethodsThe differences between US/US and CBCT/CT registrations were analyzed over 586 and 580 sessions for 24 and 25 PCa patients treated with or without pelvic lymph node irradiation, respectively. The clinical factors that may influence registration differences were also evaluated.ResultsThe average discrepancies between US/US and CBCT/CT registrations were − 0.28 ± 5.28 mm, − 0.16 ± 3.48 mm, and − 0.47 ± 4.31 mm in the superior-inferior (SI), left-right (LR), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, respectively. The discrepancies were respectively less than 5 mm longitudinally, laterally, and vertically in 64.4 and 70.1%, 84.9 and 89.2%, and 75.9 and 79.1% of the patients treated with or without pelvic lymph node irradiation, respectively. The registration differences were significantly smaller at least in one direction in patients younger than 70 years, without pelvic lymph node irradiation, guided by transperineal ultrasonography and had a bladder volume smaller than 300 mL.ConclusionsAge, irradiated regions, 3DUS modality, and bladder volume are important factors that may influence the differences between US/US and CBCT/CT registrations. 3DUS guidance is more feasible for younger PCa patients with a better control of bladder volume during the treatment and those who did not undergo pelvic lymph node irradiation.

Highlights

  • Three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) is an attractive option in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) patients

  • cone-beam CT (CBCT) examinations were successfully performed in a total of 1331 sessions (99.33%) and three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) examinations were successfully performed in 1175 sessions (87.69%)

  • All the following analyses are based on data from these 1166 paired shifts, and the accuracy evaluation of 3DUS was presented on the basis of the values provided by the soft-tissue match in CBCT

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) is an attractive option in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The potential factors influencing the accuracy of 3DUS in comparison with cone-beam CT (CBCT) in IGRT for PCa patients haven’t been clearly identified. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is more widely used than invasive methods that use implanted surrogates for target localization, CBCT inevitably involves additional radiation exposure [4,5,6], which might contribute to the increased morbidity of secondary malignancies after radiotherapy [7]. Ultrasound (US) appears to be a more attractive option than the previously described methods since it allows real-time, volumetric, noninvasive, and nonionizing target tracking for patients [8]. Factors that may affect the accuracy of 3DUS in comparison with that of CBCT remain to be determined

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call