Abstract

The usage of phase change materials (PCMs) is a way to store excess energy produced during the hot time of the day and release it during the night thereby reducing the overheating problem. While, in Latvian climate conditions overheating is not a big issue in traditional buildings since it happens only a couple of weeks per year air conditioners must still be installed to maintain thermal comfort. The need for cooling in recently built office buildings with large window area can increase significantly. It is therefore of great interest if the thermal comfort conditions can be maintained by PCMs alone or with reduced maximum power of installed cooling systems. Our initial studies show that if the test building is well-insulated (necessary to reduce heat loss in winter), phase change material is not able to solidify fast enough during the relatively short night time. To further investigate the problem various experimental setups with two different phase change materials were installed in test buildings. Experimental results are compared with numerical modelling made in software COMSOL Multiphysics. The effectiveness of PCM using different situations is widely analysed.

Highlights

  • In order to reduce cooling energy consumption, phase change materials (PCMs) are being used as a passive system for temperature condition stabilization in the room

  • A lot of papers have dealt with phase change materials being installed in a testing environment and have achieved results where the effect of PCM is shown compared with the similar environment without PCM [1] and [2]

  • The aim of the study is to evaluate how many cycles can PCM effectively use in hotter periods as a passive system in warm-summer humid continental climate conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In order to reduce cooling energy consumption, PCMs are being used as a passive system for temperature condition stabilization in the room. This kind of system saves energy that would be used for cooling and more important, in Latvian climate conditions, could even save the costs of installing air cooling devices. A lot of papers have dealt with phase change materials being installed in a testing environment and have achieved results where the effect of PCM is shown compared with the similar environment without PCM [1] and [2]. The aim of the study is to evaluate how many cycles can PCM effectively use in hotter periods as a passive system in warm-summer humid continental climate conditions. Typical overheating cycles are selected and by employing numerical model the phase change phenomena are studied

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.