Analyse comparative de 3 logiciels de reconstruction itérative de tomoscintigraphie monophotonique myocardique

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study makes a comparative analysis of the quality reconstruction of three software: 2D ordered subset expectation maximisation (2D OSEM), 3D ordered subsets expectation maximisation (Flash 3D) and Wallis. Patients and methodsThe data from myocardial scintigraphy acquisitions of 50 patients (38 men and 12 women; average age 61±9 years) were successively reconstructed using three myocardial perfusion SPECT algorithms (Flash 3D, OSEM 2D and Wallis). Different combinations of iterations and subsets were considered. For Wallis, only the cut-off frequency was considered. The image's quality was assessed by determining the maximum contrast and the signal to noise ratio. ResultsThe Wallis software provided a higher signal to noise ratio compared to Flash 3D and OSEM 2D at stress and rest. The Wallis signal to noise ratio increased by a factor 1.93 (P=0.0010) and 2.28 at stress (P=0.0009); 1.50 (P=0.0011) and 2.84 at rest (P=0.0024) compared to respectively Flash 3D and OSEM 2D. Flash 3D provided better signal to noise ratio than OSEM 2D at stress and at rest. The difference in medians and interquartile ranges of the signal-to-noise ratio in post-stress were 22 % and 54 %, respectively between Flash 3D and OSEM 2D. At rest, the difference between the two methods in signal to noise ratio was 32 %±0.,29. ConclusionWallis algorithm was improve image quality with better signal to noise ratio compared to the reference method of Siemens Flash 3D. For both Flash 3D and OSEM 2D methods, the combination with 8 subsets and 12 iterations provided the best contrast and signal to noise ratio.